Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeakersCorner
Some of you are calling this teaching of one church per city a false teaching but it isn't: it's reality.
|
You’re welcome to start a thread to debate the legitimacy of this doctrine. The point of this thread is to highlight a reality of the Lord’s Recovery, bearing its ugly head in the most recent article put out by The Lord’s Recovery.
To define and justify a doctrine, the Lords Recovery turns to what Watchman Nee & Witness lee said as the authority that dictates what this doctrine entails.
They don’t do this just once, but they do this 9 times to justify this doctrine
Quote:
From the article:
Quote:
- "Brother Nee studied this matter thoroughly and gave a series of messages on “The Assembly Life.” There he said:"
- "Brother Lee expressed particular concern"
- "Using the church in Taipei as an example, he (Lee) said
- "Elsewhere he (Lee) told us:"
- "Ignatius’s error is evident from Brother Lee’s careful exposition of Acts 20:
- "Brother Lee commented"
- "The Elders’ Management of the Church, Brother Lee clearly stated"
- "He (Lee) continued:"
- "Lee said in A Brief Presentation of the Lord’s Recovery:"
|
This people honors me with their lips,
but their heart is far from me, in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.
Don’t you see? It doesn’t matter if the doctrine is legitimate. Their whole justification for its legitimacy is based on what men say, not the word of God. Nee & Lee are not in the Bible, They are not authors of the Bible. It’s blasphemy to point to their words as authority for doctrinal matters.
The corner stone of the church is Jesus Christ, not Witness Lee, Not Watchman Nee.
Some of you will say the Lord’s Recovery doesn’t follow a man, but it does: it’s a reality. The most recent article published by the co-workers show this reality.