[OBW]

I have ignored the "spreading strife among brothers" portion because that is such a subjective thing. A lie can spread strife. The truth can spread strife. And avoiding saying something true that would spread strife is to withhold the truth. In some ways, Nee's formula is overly legalistic and is potentially circular. I sense that if it is my place to speak, then I must be truthful. But I do not need to say things that are not beneficial even if true. And I don't need to refrain from telling the truth just because there will be strife, although that might be a consideration.

Using Nee's "preferences, no strife, etc." rules provides a platform to ignore the clear rule and substitute one that can be manipulated. And it removes the need for wisdom and guidance. "Just follow this formula."

It takes wisdom to know when to speak or refrain from speaking. Preferences can be an issue. But they can also be irrelevant although present. But "do not bear false witness" cannot be ignored because of some overlay of "spiritual" mumbo-jumbo spoken by some guy that people think was so spiritual.

And to be a little more blunt, I don't think that referring to either Lee or Nee to discuss the veracity of TFOTPR is meaningful. They may or may not speak what is actually true. But it is such a crap-shoot to stake your decision on them that I just wouldn't do it. Just refer to the Bible. The 10 commandments are clear. "Preferences" and "strife" provide ways to avoid the commandment. Just let your "yes" be "yes" and your "no" be "no."

And TFOTPR fails the "don't bear false witness" test. No need to look further. Doesn't matter what Nee or Lee says about what is true or whether Deputy Authority has an out. A lie is a lie. And TFOTPR is a collection of lies. Period. No weasel room.