Local Church Discussions - View Single Post - Subtle Issues of Right and Wrong During the late 80s Rebellion

TLFisher · 10-05-2011, 06:39 PM

Several recent developments over the last several months brought to mind, what is the standard of righteousness in the recovery?
In several cases there were individuals falsely accused and unjustly convicted of crimes they did not commit. I'm talking about the West Memphis Trio who served 18 years and more recently Amanda Knox who served 4 years.
Thankfully there is a justice system that will examine the facts and conclude there was no evidence warranting their conviction.
Can we say the same of the recovery? No, we cannot. All that is needed is one person's word and that's sufficient. There is no need to know anything. Knowing equates to knowledge and knowledge brings death.
Rather the LSM leadership is comparable to the prosecuter who even when there no evidence will still claim they did it. Even in this episode http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/48-H...d=FCST_hero_tv where a prosecuter will omit evidence proving innocence just bring about a guilty verdict.
It's all about pride. How could I be wrong? It's in the flesh. No one wants to admit when they've been wrong. Or when their shortcomings is trusting too much in their peers.
I may be beating a dead horse over quarantines of brothers. My point is not about these brothers, but the practice of quarantines. If it happened to these brothers, it can happen to you.

10-05-2011, 06:39 PM	#100
TLFisher Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Renton, Washington Posts: 3,558	Re: Subtle Issues of Right and Wrong During the late 80s Rebellion Several recent developments over the last several months brought to mind, what is the standard of righteousness in the recovery? In several cases there were individuals falsely accused and unjustly convicted of crimes they did not commit. I'm talking about the West Memphis Trio who served 18 years and more recently Amanda Knox who served 4 years. Thankfully there is a justice system that will examine the facts and conclude there was no evidence warranting their conviction. Can we say the same of the recovery? No, we cannot. All that is needed is one person's word and that's sufficient. There is no need to know anything. Knowing equates to knowledge and knowledge brings death. Rather the LSM leadership is comparable to the prosecuter who even when there no evidence will still claim they did it. Even in this episode http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/48-H...d=FCST_hero_tv where a prosecuter will omit evidence proving innocence just bring about a guilty verdict. It's all about pride. How could I be wrong? It's in the flesh. No one wants to admit when they've been wrong. Or when their shortcomings is trusting too much in their peers. I may be beating a dead horse over quarantines of brothers. My point is not about these brothers, but the practice of quarantines. If it happened to these brothers, it can happen to you.