Quote:
Originally Posted by Igzy
By unreservedly recommending Lee and his outspoken, often over-the-top and sometimes mistaken ministry, Canfield and his camp are risking the perpetuation of error...The LC and its various offshoots cannot truly reform until they honestly admit the mistakes of Lee.
|
Of course I agree with this and I think this is yet another "category" i.e. the reformers. But I think they are not merely "risking the perpetuation of error" they are actively participating in promoting it.
Canfield and others in the GLA including Chu have this idea that Witness Lee is a-okay and the BB/LSM are the bad guys. (BTW I don't think Titus actually believes this but he pretends to because he considers Witness Lee as his "spiritual father" who's errors etc. should be covered as a matter of honoring him etc. This may have more to do with his culture than anything else.) Anyway IMHO this would be like Luther saying the Pope is a-okay and the Curia are the bad guys.
Personally I think LC reformers are wasting their valuable time if they really think anything will change for the better. Regardless of which version of the LC is embraced it still has an entrenched culture. The LC
with Witness Lee, the ground of locality, we are better than other Christians attitude, etc
minus the BB is still the LC.