Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
This is textbook double standard. "When we do it, it's okay, because we're correcting, rebuking, and perfecting. When others do it, it's not okay, because they're being critical, attacking and accusing." The loaded terminology reveals the subjective nature of the person speaking.
|
When the 'cult' label has been applied to the LC, that is a form of outside critique. It's basically others saying that hey we don't think your teachings line up with orthodox teachings or that certain practices are concerning. Sure it's a strong word, but ultimately when there is a group teaching things like "don't get into your mind", what do they really expect, that no one is going to take issue with such teachings? Plenty of members buy into it, but on the outside, it sets off all kinds of alarms.
Back when I attended some of the semi-annual training in the mid-2000's, I remember Ron telling us that Lee was the "acting God". That's quite a concerning statement. So as a member what was I supposed to do, not "get into my mind" about it? Problem is, that is exactly what they wanted us to do, to swallow it without a second thought. Those like Nigel who publicly challenged such teachings were viciously attacked.
They cannot simultaneously claim to not be a cult, yet deny members the basic right to challenge and discuss teachings. Why must every member who speaks out be slandered and attacked? There is something very dark beneath the surface. Members are trapped in their own mindset, so much so that they can't even come here and have a frank and honest discussion. That was my invitation in the first post of this thread, for current members or lurkers to come join this discussion. The silence is deafening.