[Freedom]

Originally Posted by Intothewind

The same way as people may reluctantly include outsiders into the so called "Lord's Recovery". It is beyond annoying how Lee cherry picked which aspects of church history were surely "in the Lords Move" naturally culminating with Nee and Lee and the local churches.

I remember one of the blendeds drawing this out on a map of the world as he recited the LC version of church history. He went on and was about to concluded and suddenly clamoring was heard from the crowd.

"You forgot Australia!"

"What?"

"What about the saints in Australia?"

Turns to map
-draws quick line from China to Australia

"Ah yes, and the Lord spread to Australia and New Zealand too"

The end

It's ironic how everything the LC considers to be the "Lord's move" in the 20th century centered around what WN and WL were doing. For example, they might say that the Lord moved to Taiwan in 1949, and then moved to the US in the early 60's. The funny thing is that 1949 is when Lee moved to Taiwan and the early 60's when he moved to the U.S. So the "Lord's move" is equated with whatever Lee was doing. So if someone mentions Australia, or any other place Lee wasn't involved with, well there might be blank stares. Never would they admit that anything else going on outside the LC sect could be part of the "Lord's move" as well.