You know, I don't begrudge Witness Lee the God-given right to function as a Christian. If he wanted to speak, and give messages, fine. If he felt some "light" on a certain passage, or wanted to expound themes in scripture, like "God's New Testament Economy", fine. Publish away. But why deny everyone else the same basic Christian right, to think and speak and write and function as a member of the Body of Christ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
Anyone else who tried to function in his LC kingdom was seen as an ambitious usurper, "drawing others after themselves", etc. Everyone else had to sublimate their gifts ..."Each one has" of 1 Cor 14 became, in his hands, each one standing after the lecture of Lee-ism and speaking 3 sentences of how wonderful and enjoyable and enlightening it was. Lee nullified the function of the members of the Body more thoroughly than any clergy-laity system of Christianity ever did.
|
Here's a testimony from the Ohio region of the USA, showing what happened whenever any gifted LC member tried to function according to the measure given them by Christ Jesus. Was that particular gifted member perfect, complete, and entire? Probably not. But it can't be overstressed that ANY function apart from lifting up Witness Lee (and in this case his local deputy Titus Chu) was simply impermissible. This is why I say the Lee system nullified the function of the members of the Body of Christ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
I was part of the team of saints which migrated in 1977 to begin the churchlife in Columbus. That thriving, joyful, fruitful church was nearly decimated in the early 80's by the harsh abuse and damages inflicted upon Phil Comfort by Titus Chu. Years ago most of us just did not understand how abusive and manipulative Titus Chu could be towards other workers, elders, and churches. There is absolutely no justification in the scriptures for the "management style" which he exhibits over the GLA. Where is one verse which promotes his public shaming? Where is one verse which permits the mistreatment other brothers are forced to endure?
The church in Columbus was thriving for years under the leadership of John Myer. The blessings they enjoyed were envied and copied around the GLA. For example, John Myer read The Purpose Driven Church by Rich Warren, and soon the whole GLA was reading the book. After what has transpired in recent years, one can easily see that the exact same spirit of intolerance and manipulation exhibited by Anaheim can be seen in Cleveland. As John has written, "I will be questioned and found guilty," and in the end it is the church that suffers. Just a repeat of history in the church in Columbus.
Let me speak plainly for those who still wonder what happened. Neither Phil Comfort nor John Myer have ever been accused of anything even remotely bordering on inappropriate behavior. Nothing at all, nothing whatsoever. Ironically they both lived in the same meager ranch house on church property. Though separated in time by some 20+ years, both were well-loved and appreciated by the saints in Columbus. Both had a jovial, personal disposition which well-respected the brothers around them. Both were dedicated workers which gave out much more than they took in. Both were passionate in their ministry and had a positive impact upon the saints.
Thus they both had the same problem. They posed a serious risk to the prevailing power structure in Cleveland headquarters, and hence they needed to "know their place," which can only be accomplished by being beat down in front of others. Titus Chu would never share his glory with anyone, at least not within the limits of his reach. Saints can suffer loss, churches can be devastated, and workers can be disposed of, just as long as every brother pays the necessary homage to "the brother who raised us up."
|