Local Church Discussions - View Single Post

12-29-2015, 04:35 AM

"The consummation of this understanding forms the basis of this translation and its footnotes. Hence, this translation and the accompanying footnotes could be calle the 'crystallization' of the understanding of the divine revelation which the saints everywhere have attained to in the past two thousand years."
1. one CAN claim the footnotes could be called the 'crystallization' of the understanding of the divine revelation which the saints everywhere have attained to in the past two thousand years.', CANNOT claim the bible (this translation) could be called such. Unless 'this translation' does not equate 'the bible'?
2. The bible is God's word. God started speaking long before two thousand years ago. The bible existed as is (old and new testament) since nearly two thousand years ago, not when 'this translation' first published. Please LSM tell us -when did 'this translation' began work and when did it finished work.
3. The bible is holy, the bible is God inspired. 'This translation' could be called the 'crystallization' of the understanding of the divine revelation which the saints everywhere have attained to ... The bible IS the divine revelation, 'this translation'- 'crystallization' of the understanding of the divine revelation?
4. Who are the participants of the 'crystallization'? Who are the authors of 'this translation'?
5. How much time and effort was taken to 'crystallize' the 'understanding' of the divine revelation which the saints everywhere have attained to in the past two thousand years?
6. How many 'saints' from the EVERYWHERE over the TWO THOUSAND YEARS have endorsed and gave rights for their 'understanding' of the divine revelation to be 'crystallized' in 'this translation'.
5. How accurate have the unnamed 'saints''s 'understanding' been understood and properly 'crystallized'?
6. What is this act of 'crystallization'? God inspired? God commanded? God allowed? or what? OR the unnamed 'saints' inspired, or commanded, commissioned, allowed? or what?
There are more questions and doubts ...
TEST, TEST, TEST, ...

12-29-2015, 04:35 AM	#2
Unregistered Guest Posts: n/a	Re: PUTTING TO TEST THE RCV "The consummation of this understanding forms the basis of this translation and its footnotes. Hence, this translation and the accompanying footnotes could be calle the 'crystallization' of the understanding of the divine revelation which the saints everywhere have attained to in the past two thousand years." 1. one CAN claim the footnotes could be called the 'crystallization' of the understanding of the divine revelation which the saints everywhere have attained to in the past two thousand years.', CANNOT claim the bible (this translation) could be called such. Unless 'this translation' does not equate 'the bible'? 2. The bible is God's word. God started speaking long before two thousand years ago. The bible existed as is (old and new testament) since nearly two thousand years ago, not when 'this translation' first published. Please LSM tell us -when did 'this translation' began work and when did it finished work. 3. The bible is holy, the bible is God inspired. 'This translation' could be called the 'crystallization' of the understanding of the divine revelation which the saints everywhere have attained to ... The bible IS the divine revelation, 'this translation'- 'crystallization' of the understanding of the divine revelation? 4. Who are the participants of the 'crystallization'? Who are the authors of 'this translation'? 5. How much time and effort was taken to 'crystallize' the 'understanding' of the divine revelation which the saints everywhere have attained to in the past two thousand years? 6. How many 'saints' from the EVERYWHERE over the TWO THOUSAND YEARS have endorsed and gave rights for their 'understanding' of the divine revelation to be 'crystallized' in 'this translation'. 5. How accurate have the unnamed 'saints''s 'understanding' been understood and properly 'crystallized'? 6. What is this act of 'crystallization'? God inspired? God commanded? God allowed? or what? OR the unnamed 'saints' inspired, or commanded, commissioned, allowed? or what? There are more questions and doubts ... TEST, TEST, TEST, ...