[Freedom]

The CBs reproduce a little article by N. Tomes in which he argues against the notion of a singular minister of the age. But has he proved anything at all? If the saints read carefully what he has to say and weigh his arguments soberly, I believe that they will see that he is trying to pull the wool over their eyes.

It's interesting that Kerry expects Nigel to 'disprove' the concept of there being a MOTA. Obviously with certain LC teachings, the burden of proof fell upon WL or now the current set of blendeds. They have failed to provide a reasonable argument for these teachings and instead resort to immature games of finger pointed.

I read through what Kerry wrote. It's funny how he could spend so much time criticizing Nigel or projecting certain motives onto him without addressing the substance of what was written.