Quote:
Originally Posted by Igzy
Hope, I really, really appreciate your being here. I just wanted to say that.
Let me say that when you say LSM has no interest in the one city one church model I am taken aback because I think that the teaching is still one means they use to control people.
First the claim to be the unique ministry to the local churches, then they claim that believers can only be in the local churches, add to this the implicit claim that they get to decide which local churches are genuine local churches, then they have the means of complete control.
So the one-church-one-city teaching is just another tool in their toolbox to control people. It's not the only one, but it's still an important one. Though it seems their global church ("The Baaady") model is becoming and even more important means of control for them.
What say you?
|
Igzy,
The way you put it makes sense. But the BBs would never think "control." WL could never bring himself to accept the thought that there could be any kind of hierarchy or control over any church or saint. I spoke with him directly a few times about this and it also came up in a few elder-co/worker meetings. He always had a reaction like "how could this ever be." I heard him declare more than once, "We never practice control or hierarchy." I believe he sincerely believed that he never exercised control. From our vantage point on the hillside we can only shake our heads at his delusion. I believe it is the same with the BBs.
Now when you come to the matter of oneness and deputy authority it is another matter. Take your line of reasoning of eldership and one church, one city and you can easily see control.
On the other hand, the concept of one church, one city was a big item before the LSM. After the creation of the LSM and the centralization under Max Rapoport, the talk of the local ground was only selectively used. Mostly it was spoken against when some elders were taking it on the chin for not lining up with the latest flow.
In Raleigh, NC the LSMers left the city for a while because they could not take over the original church in Raleigh. But they came back a few years later and "retook the ground of the church." What a joke!! Since the original church in Raleigh would not submit to the control of Anaheim they lost their franchise. Now we have the real local church in Raleigh. Are you laughing yet? I am not laughing I am crying. What a farce.
I heard a few years back that the BBs have reduced the local churches to a mere procedure.
Thus, I must concede your point. The teaching of one church, one city, one set of elders etc is a tool for control.
Hope, Don Rutledge
PS For a while the LSM believers were the local church in Cary, NC, a suburb of Raleigh. Then one day with LSM sponsorship and a weekend conference for retaking the ground they became the local church in Raleigh. I cannot make this stuff up. Foolish, Foolishness, Ridiculous!!! How could something so stupid take place. It was not children playing in the sandbox. Would that it were.
Take one local man who was obsessed with self importance and ambition, mix in racial loyalty by 10-12 from Taiwan, add in the fleshly desire to be a part of a movement and to feel special about yourself and you get this Frankenstein monster child which brings shame to us all.