Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
Again, not exactly sure what you are saying. Are you saying that the real proof that Witness Lee taught deification is not that he taught deification but that he taught "he should be worshipped" (I have made that slight change because I don't think for a moment he thought you should be worshipped).
If that is what you are saying it seems to me that you are equating the teaching of deification with the teaching of worship of men. Which is what I have been saying the entire time. So then, we are coming to an agreement.
|
That's right, forget about what word he used for a moment, Lee wrote many times that men are not to be worshiped. If you have any sort of written statement by him that men can be or are to be worshipped, that would prove he taught deification in the "true sense" of the word.
If he didn't, then he was not teaching deification, but merely used a word which could be misinterpreted.
However in actuality deification
does have two meanings, as testallthings has rightly pointed out.