Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Your example does not fit here. Wygand was an individual. Obama has an administration with millions of employees and contractors.
|
This is the weak link in the theory. The CIA knows that they cannot keep a secret unless they "tie up loose ends", a euphemism for killing everyone who might know something. The deaths of so many key witnesses in the JFK assassination is the strongest piece of evidence that it was a conspiracy carried out by the CIA. The Mafia also has tried and failed to keep secrets. How is it that some low level tech guy who would know the truth and could sell it for $1 million keeps quiet? I can understand Obama and Clinton keeping quiet, but since they didn't tap the phones themselves there are others who know the truth. In the tobacco case the man who blew the whistle did so at great personal risk and financial loss. He risked going to prison, his kids ending up on welfare without health care when they were asthmatic and could die. In contrast a government employee who knows that Obama broke the law risks absolutely nothing, no way Trump allows them to be fired if they come forward, and they will score a very big payday. Doesn't get better than that, you get paid a million dollars for being a hero who protects democracy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Can you prove that no one in the Obama administration tapped Trump's phones? Of course not, because we now know, via Snowden, that not just Trump's lines were tapped but yours and mine too! Not just metadata, but the whole conversation, sitting in cyber space ready to be mined for evil.
|
Again, you ignore my point about the DNC hacked emails. Who cares that the phones have been tapped, recorded and stored at NSA if no one has listened in? If they did listen in and yet did not forward any information gleaned to the Clinton campaign, again so what? Trump likened this to Watergate. Therefore all you need to prove that something did take place is the DNC emails during the Clinton campaign. These will prove they knew something from inside the Trump campaign. That would be the smoking gun. So yes, since those emails have all been hacked and leaked, Trump could easily prove his claim if it were true. Not only so but he has had 4 months. I imagine that those emails have already been poured over and dissected under a microscope by the RNC and the Trump campaign. Since he still has not given any evidence I have to assume there was not any evidence in those emails.
