Quote:
Originally Posted by zeek
A lot of the opinions you have attributed to me are based on your conclusion that I'm a liberal rather than anything I have actually said. Your conclusions often don't follow logically from the "facts" you cited. Besides it's not like rebutting your facts would change your mind. That assumes that your position is based on reason, which it isn't.
Show me where I posted a fake news cite. Who told you it was fake news? Tapper finds fault with one article in Slate and you advise not to believe anything you read there. That typifies all-or-nothing, absolutistic thinking. That kind of thinking perpetuates prejudice.
|
The link I posted provided numerous examples of fake news from slate.com. How ironic that they would become the arbiter of fake news. Apparently you didn't read it. That's understandable since I usually don't read your links either.
You have often provided numerous links that were simply Trump hate and slander.
It's you who provides absolutistic thinking. You just project your bad traits on me. But being a know-it-all, you can't see yourself objectively.
Why is it, for example, that not one of your posts ever presents either the Bible or Trump positively. I posted numerous times about my concerns about Trump, but you can't hear that because I don't hate like you do. He one the election, but like the media "opposition party," you don't give him a chance.