Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
I saw the lawyer explaining the lawsuit of one of those who complained. She was upset because O'Reilly called her "hysterical" saying it was a sexist remark. She then went on to give him the etymology of the word as though no one knew where the word came from. After that she was never invited back onto his show, hence her complaint.
I listened to that on CNN (I never watched O'Reilly) and felt her complaint was absurd. The idea that you can't use "hysterical" to refer to a woman because of the history of the word is, and that you would use this as some basis for a lawsuit, is in my opinion, an example of a feminazi.
|
I/we weren't there. But if O'Reilly was referring to the medical condition, as if she was in need of manual stimulation, then maybe she's got a case. Otherwise her case was going to go nowhere.
So why the $13 mil? And why fire the guy if there weren't more than meets our eyes there?