[awareness]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Yes, your interpretation avoids the facts, twists the narrative, and distorts the truth.

Your reading is tentative and provisional? Subject to the whims of the day and the winds of heresy?

The Bible was written by actual eye-witnesses, who recorded their accounts. There were multiple confirmations. I understand that you can't handle the truth, and anyone who actually believes the scripture must be a simpleton conned by some shyster.

Actually the real shyster is your boy Ehrman.

How dare you cast aspersion's at a top Bible scholar. I'll bet you don't do the same toward Daniel Wallace, and they are on par with each other.

And where in the Bible does it say the Bible was written by eye witnesses?