[OBW]

Ohio,

Thanks for the information. While me goal was not to categorize, from your comments and the general positions in both the various documents published on the Concerned Brothers site and the short article posted here, he fits in nicely, even if not entirely square on, with Nigel, John Myer and many of the others in the GLA, along with some elsewhere that we know. While I still may have issues with some of the principal teachings of the LC, I see these men as leading toward a different kind of LC, primarily one that ceases from its exclusiveness and is more connected with its brethren in Christianity that have been so maligned under the prior and even current dogmas.

In any case, my real point was to understand rather than be confused by the use of so much LC lingo while taking on the LSM/BB establishment. It is fully understandable and probably to be expected. It may not always be that way, but for now that's what it is.