Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
A brief biased history from a blended ...
|
The funniest thing is how this document cites Lee and only Lee so heavily on each page ("then as Brother Lee points out"), as if he was the only person to cover the history of the Reformation. As a church kid, I was so surprised visiting Amish, Moravian, etc communities and finding that their recountings were pretty much identical to the ones I had heard attributed merely to the insights of the great Lee. Until the 20th century, which belongs exclusively to Nee and Lee, of course. Actually, the bias in this history is not funny, it's repulsive.