[awareness]

kisstheson:
>> Interestingly, in these messages spoken in the Philippines, TAS makes mention of a somewhat lengthy experience of the Lord’s chastisement. Perhaps he is speaking of his experience from the late 1950’s? I will try to find the exact quote where TAS mentioned this experience and post it here in this thread. <<

And we await to read what you find.

But no matter what Lee has to say about TAS, in my estimation TAS was much more true to his Christian teachings than Lee was to his own, and in his humilty before the Lord too.

This can clearly be seen in the publishing of both men, and how they contrast. Lee copyrights all his material (have you ever been on a LSM site, where they say it's copyrighted even for personal use - and then your public IP is posted, as a warning that they can find you?)

But TAS wouldn't allow his works to be copyrighted. He presented them to all the saints, and for any use whatsoever. This is how a proper Christian, one that's not worshiping mammon, should act.

But not Lee. His aim was obviously, money, money, money....and that's why he never dealt with Philip...and why he copyrighted his works.

How can anyone that would allow the sin of Philip to continue, dare to criticize TAS? And claim that the flow left TAS? Seems to me that "For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again."

If the flow of God was with Lee, Lee sure tainted that flow with his lust for money. I mean, selling the Life-Studies? What's that about, but money, money, money.

TAS wasn't caught up in that.... So I posit that, the real flow remained with TAS, and the real flow can't be cornered, like Lee acted like it could be. Unlike TAS Lee was a megalomanic.