Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake
-1
aron>"How do we assume that Witness Lee was so transformed by this "life long process" that all his judgments were true"
That is true for all of us. Includes mine and your posts.
So now what?
Drake
|
So now, when Ed Marks is giving a conference message, he can say, "I see something Witness Lee didn't see.", or "Here, Witness Lee was entertaining natural concepts", or "Here we can see Witness Lee being inconsistent in his interpretations", or "Here we can see Witness Lee violating the NT principle of scriptural reception", etc.
How come we can say this with Martin Luther, but not with Witness Lee? How come Witness Lee can pan Peter or James or Malachi or David, but nobody in the conference can stand up and say, "Wait a minute here - not so fast"?
So now what? If that's true with Witness Lee why don't we see any evidence of that? All I see is evidence of him dismissing scripture as natural concepts, but nobody being able to do the same with him.
None of us presume to be so "transformed by the life process" that we are beyond further correction. Why can nobody correct Lee?