Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
There is no indictment for collusion, but that is not the same as "no evidence for collusion". It is far too early for us to say there is no evidence. What there is clearly indictments for is Russian meddling to help Trump get elected. We also have a number of people who have pled guilty and are working with the prosecution. There is no reason for the prosecutor to cut deals if this is all he has. Everything, including the wording on these indictments, indicates that there is still more to come.
Please. Are you now upset that the US government is investigating Russian meddling in our elections? That is absurd.
|
Ohio's knee-jerk response is to defend the alpha male. It's a characteristic that would have put him in good stead in the LCM.
He seems to imagine that he "knows" the real truth behind the scenes in advance better than any special prosecutor could possibly find out through investigation. Just like Trump, he declares over and over how whatever is found "proves" that there was no "collusion".
Authoritarian mindsets are the human medium for the outer ripples of the sound wave in Trump's echo chamber.