Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
Since they continually claim that we have not seen any evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians let's consider that.
|
1. We have seen evidence that the Russians meddled in the campaign.
Everyone knows they meddle in our elections. Done so for since the 1920's. And we meddled in elections all over the world too. Obama meddled in Israel's recent election. "Meddling" obfuscates "collusion" for the ignorant.
2. We have seen evidence that this meddling was intended to help Trump win, at least from the time it was Clinton vs Trump.
The Russians tried to help Bernie, Hilary, Jill Stein, Trump, and others. Their goal was to divide the country. They are still doing a great job of this, even though they spent fractions of a penny for every Hilary dollar.
3. We have seen 3 members of Trump's campaign, 2 from the inner circle plead guilty presumably as part of a deal with Mueller. That would indicate they had information that Mueller was willing to trade for.
Flynn's crime, for one, was a "process crime," iow there was NO CRIME until Muller began investigating him (Strzok did so illegally too,) -- Just keep interrogating these folks until we can prove some sort of lie.
4. We have seen evidence of high level meetings between Trump's campaign and the Russians.
How does this compare with Hilary paying millions for the Russian Dossier? Talk about meddling in an election!
What we have not seen, but would like to see is a careful examination of Donald Trump's financial records, as well as his children and in-laws financial record.
By golly, if we have to go back to the 1970's, we'll find a crime some where! Check his ex-wives! Check his neighbors! How about his deceased parents! Let's go back to the 10th generation!
Instead of collusion, we may very well find a much more serious crime of money laundering, bribery and extortion.
Ahhh! The real goal of the special prosecutor! What happened to the election results?