Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness
Okay. That's fair. Then explain what you mean by :
"What I strongly protest are these radical leftists like ANTIFA and BLM who want to remove our rights to assemble and exercise free speech, especially in schools."
|
You said that I support Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists, but I don't. I only support free speech, and not violence.
Too many of these ANTIFA, BLM, and Liberal activists are violently shutting down conservative free speech. (
Did you see the violence last year at UC Berkeley, the supposed birth place of free speech?) Liberal Universities are actively censuring conservative speech and ideas. (
UC Berkeley stopped Ann Coulter from speaking) Silicone Valley tech giants are suppressing all conservative speech. (
Google fired an engineer for conservative views.)
Trump was soundly condemned as a "racist white supremacist" for a single comment after the Charlottesville protests. He said, "there are good people on both sides." What he said was true. I watched some film clips and I saw children marching on both sides. I'm sure they were there with someone else. But there were violent protesters on both sides too. Why was Trump not condemned for saying some of the ANTIFA activists were "good people?" Why did the media not condemn the violent ANTIFA protesters?
We are a great nation because we allow both sides to speak, like the old saying, "I may not agree with anything you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." That is now changing. We have ANTIFA shooting police, and they are not condemned. Why is that? Why does the media get to decide which speech is "politically correct," and which speech is "hate speech?" Why does Louis Farakhan get to hate Jews and Whites as Satan, without any condemnation? Just listen to one of his speeches.