Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
I am aware that this is the reason that Sessions (who definitely lacked candor in his own testimony) gave for firing him. I am also aware that McCabe is going to respond and that we have not been given access to all the information.
You may be right, Sessions may be right. But even if he is right he is also a hypocrite who has not provided me with sufficient evidence to make a judgement.
As far as watching the news, I watch as little as I can get away with. If I see a story that is important I will read a little on it. But for the most part the "news" is simply blowhards prognosticating. I hate the news that I am seeing, I certainly don't need to double and triple the time spent with a bunch of useless discussion on possible ways it will play out.
Think about Mueller, he doesn't say a word except to give subpoena's and indictments. Yet there is endless discussion, every day about him, what he might be doing, and this is fueled by all the tweets from Trump and comments made by his lawyers, etc. Eliminate all the commentary and you have enough real news to make headlines on three or four days.
|
So you need Sessions to provide you with enough evidence? Has Muller done the same for you?
You felt that the indictment of Flynn was justification and vindication for Muller. If Flynn's conviction is vacated for prosecutorial misconduct, would you reconsider? If McCabe and Strzok are indicted for using the phony Dossier to deceive FISC, would you also admit that the whole Russian collusion was intelligence disinformation -- a presidential coup?
I have pointed out some news sites which are actually doing legitimate investigative work. I thought that would be of interest to you. You are right about all the commentary noise on the airwaves. The real news is coming from what the FBI and DOJ are slowly releasing and a few investigative reporters. None of that is being reported on, except to provide disinformation, discrediting, and general hysteria.