Quote:
Originally Posted by leastofthese
Their conclusion to why DCP lawsuits are permitted is, "From this exchange we can perceive that Watchman Nee drew a distinction between a lawsuit filed for personal gain or interest, such as the one recorded in 1 Corinthians, and those involving the protection of basic freedoms and the defense of the truth."
|
Wow! So the lawsuits "Protected basic freedoms" and they were the "defense of the truth"?
Watchman Nee is able to decide what part of the Bible to obey and what part to ignore?
Their lawsuits were "not for personal gain"?
arrogance. : an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions.
From this statement DCP admits the Bible prohibits lawsuits but view Watchman Nee's "distinctions" as superseding the word of God.