Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
And where are your scholars who also have sanctioned Martin Luther the first Minister of the Age? Try to get your facts straight matey!
|
They state that Luther recovered salvation by faith. That is the topic we were discussing, not "Minister of the Age". Let's address the facts one at a time.
Knowing this fact, it is easy to see how Luther is qualified to be a Minister of the Age. I don't expect any scholar to use this language, but they do appreciate that Luther had a bigger role in the Reformation than you seem to admit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Taking my words out of context? I expect more from the current LSM mouthpiece. The " worst in Martin Luther" comment referred specifically to his dismissal of the book of James ( "straw epistle fit for burning") and his anti-Semitic rants. But you knew that. And you call me a liar? 
Your other deceptive technique is to present a false choice set, like Drake does. Since I don't accept that Luther is the first MOTA of the Recovery, then I must be some contemptuous " closet Catholic" like you find on other forums. |
Yes I know what it referred to and I remarked that if Luther did not dismiss the book of James, then we would still be reading the Latin Vulgate with the Apocrypha as well.
The reason is, that it would very hard to convince Catholic people of justification by faith alone and convert them to the Reformation as long as the book of James about faith+works was staring them in the face.
The Reformation was mainly built upon a doctrine of justification by faith (alone) of which it seemed necessary for Luther to dismiss the book of James. The Catholic doctrine very much depended upon and still depends today on a literal interpretation of James - "your (saving) faith is dead unless you have works".
My "closet Catholic" remark stems from understanding that Luther's doctrine of justification by faith alone does not blend well with the book of James. Defending James, to a degree, is almost to defend Catholicism.
It is popular today for evangelicals to explain away what the book of James says, but this is only reminiscent of closer ties between Catholicism and Evangelicism in my view. It is interesting that Luther did not merely try to "explain away" the book of James as evangelicals do today, but dismissed it outright, at least initially.
The goal of any good Catholic who wants to convert an Evangelical is firstly to get them to see how Luther's justification by faith alone was wrong - to do that they will use the book of James. The goal of any good Protestant, or Reformer, is to turn our attention away from James's saving works, and focus ourselves on the Scriptures regarding salvation by faith alone. At least, a real Reformer would do that in my view.
The book of James was such a problem for the Reformers that Calvin went to the lengths of adding the word "alone" to James 2:24.
I would just like to bring your attention to a Catholic blog which supports everything I have been saying:
But there's good news about this, because once we see why Protestants have continued to follow Calvin by adding the word "alone" to James 2:24, we will be able to refute Luther's heresy all the more easily.
http://catholicnick.blogspot.com/201...-to-james.html
In this blog we can see the Catholic's aim to convert Protestants, and secondly their aim to use James to refute the Reformation.