Quote:
Originally Posted by zeek
Your "perspective" doesn't include recognizing "this woman" as a person with a name. Are you referring to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Deborah Ramirez or has someone else come forward with complaints about Kavanaugh?
|
I identified her as the one scheduled to testify before a hearing on Thursday, obviously Dr. Ford. If you look at the evidence it appears to be nothing but a false witness. If that is the case then are you allowing liars and cheats to come forward one at a time to railroad the legislative process?
We don't need two rapes to disqualify him, one is good enough. But if they sat on this bogus claim for 6 weeks and then are able to delay the process for 2 weeks then a second false claim can easily delay it for another 2 weeks.
So I stand by my original position -- at this point this woman should be heard and her claim fully investigated. If it turns out to be dirty tricks by the Democrats all involved should be prosecuted and go to jail for slander. Then this case can be a precedent that these hearings do not allow anyone to make a charge without at least 2 witnesses (physical evidence is a witness).