Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
The return address proves this was obviously a political stunt designed to influence the election. The skill at making something like this indicates military training. The scope of all the bombs sent indicates an organization.
I am guessing the Russians.
|
The Russians seem to prefer chemicals. I would give them far more respect than these inept devices display.
Seriously though, all the news coming out seems to indicate that none of these was actually a bomb. One pro commented that the photo circulating from CNN seemed more like a stage prop. And how in the world did Jim Acosta get to take a picture of this faux-bomb?
I would guess that the level of professionalism to be found in these devices has more to do with hiding evidence than with actual explosive capability.