Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
If the Recovery teaching about "covering" were an actual truth of the Bible, then shouldn't King David have cursed the prophet Nathan for not "covering" him? (II Samuel 12)
David was, after all, the greatest anointed king of Israel. If ever there was needed this "covering" teaching it was for him.
|
They might say that Nathan "uncovered" David in private. But the Bible records the uncovering. So much for David's privacy. They might said, well, David is not here anymore. But neither is Witness Lee. So why do they need to keep "covering" him? Wouldn't it be better if everyone was able to learn from his failures, as we are from David's? But then his mystique as MOTA would be compromised. Turns out that's what protecting his image is all about.