Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxjobox
Ohio- it’s very hard to follow your train of thought:
Yes, if WL would have been a minister to recover the church, he would have brought us out of the 4th century dogmas to the scripture. We, including you would have the greatest appreciation for the God and Father of our Lord Jesus, the Holy Spirit would have witnessed to the truth, the church would be built on the rock of Jesus being th Christ, the son of the Living God, and God would have a great testimony, the church would be that pillar and ground of the truth, rather than confusion.
Why are we even discussing this- it’s because there is no trinity teaching in the scripture, there is no Jesus is God gospel presented, and Paul clearly told us there is one God, the Father, and Jesus told us the Father is the only TRUE GOD.
Ohio, accept and live by what is written in the scripture, not by some man-made god!
|
So obnoxious. This has become so tedious discussing anything with
BJB.
I have continually based all my points on the scripture, using scripture to support them. Then, as is his constant modus operandi,
BJB returns to 4th century dogmas or WL's Recovery teachings to tell me why I am some dreaded trinitarian. Then he tells me to read the book of Acts.
Talk about being hard to follow, do you even read all that has been written to you?
Let me make this one thought perfectly clear: I believe, based on the scripture, that Jesus Christ is God. I believed this long before my contact with the LC's.
Perhaps it's time to move on. You and I have nothing more to learn from each other about this subject.