Quote:
Originally Posted by clever sister
You seem very interested in the internal politics of the LGBT+ community.
If you must know, some radical feminists who view men as the "enemy" have decided that transwomen are actually just men in dresses trying to get access to women's spaces for nefarious purposes, even though the evidence does not show this to be the case at all. JK Rowling has for many years been suspected of sharing these viewpoints and recently confirmed that she does.
Did not know you were so eager to support the views of a "Wiccan".
|
I don't support Wiccan religion, but even this radical feminist has serious concerns about the trans movement. She is not alone either. I only supported her ideas in this open letter. Is there some law that says I cannot agree with her when her concerns match my own?
Society has become upside down. Of course there will be trans women who want to "
get access to women's spaces for nefarious purposes."
Why not? There are numerous reasons for this. I already mentioned sports. Athletes born male have many advantages over athletes born female in many high dollar sports. One of my sons claims he could have been a sports legend had he been able to play basketball as a trans woman.
Think about other "
nefarious purposes" we have seen regarding race. We had a presidential candidate who rose to academic and political prominence claiming to be Native American. We have had numerous people who have transitioned into African Americans for personal gain. Why would they do such a thing if hatred and racism was so prevalent in America. Obviously it is not. Being part of some identity intersectionality, whether race, gay, trans, or better yet
all three, has definite perks, or they would not be doing so.
It is not LGBT "internal politics" that concerns me. Obviously the recent SCOTUS ruling tells us that these are not "internal politics," but have an impact on all of us.