Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Nice to see you too zeek. Glad to see you are surviving this DemPanic. 
I'm am not opposed to any " new thinking," rather I believe all new thinking must be vetted for value, veracity, and virtue. Assaulting the personal integrity of the holy Lamb of God qualifies for none of these.
It truly amazes me that you would consider attacks on the virtue and character of Jesus Christ as merely an acceptable forum inquiry, and yet make my expected responses to these posts a "personal attack" to yourself.
I just saw a recent post on the forum by ZNP. Being a teacher from NYC, he has faced much greater hardship than most. |
I didn't question Jesus' virtue or character. I asserted that the Bible makes no explicit statement about his marital status or sexuality thus leaving the matter open for speculation.
You accused me of "trolling", having "a crooked heart" and implied that I was a "false prophet" worthy of "swift destruction" by quoting 2 Peter 2.1. I'll let others decide for themselves if that was a personal attack on me or not.