Quote:
Originally Posted by zeek
That's right. Humperdinck's argument is an ad hominem fallacy dismissing Oestreicher's argument based nothing more than questionable inferences Humperdinck makes about Oestreicher from a single photo.
|
I'll make a deal with you zeek, you don't try to bolster your argument by referencing somebody's supposed credentials (Anglican priest) and I won't bother to point out that your "proof" is coming from a fraud. If you don't want me to be shootin your fish in that barrel, don't bring out that barrel full of fish and shove it in my face. Deal partner?