![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,693
|
![]() Quote:
These loads are basically static in nature, discounting a couple tons of weight from occupants coming and going. The only dynamic loads designed for would be movement from the earth and weather. Probably the worst of these in NYC would be hurricane force wind gusts, which would load one side of the base of the building and unload the other. Hence all skyscrapers must accommodate worst case wind gusts, and they can be significant on such a huge structure. The tragedy of 9/11 presented entirely new dynamic loading. Once the structures at the crash site (perhaps a half dozen floors) buckled due to the intense heat, effectively dropping the available yield strength of the steel, dynamic loads due to gravity were introduced onto otherwise undamaged pillars beneath them. The simple rule in dynamic loading says that the added forces of a moving load, at minimum, doubles the load. Thus a load which falls from only 1 mm, and never has opportunity to accelerate, STILL doubles the load. On top of this doubling, we must add the dynamic component of the weight falling roughly 10 feet at a time. Think about hammering a nail into a 2 by 4. Lay a 20 oz framing hammer on a nail and nothing happens. Up it to a 16 lb sledge, and still we see only an indent in the wood fibers. Now swing away, and you get a feel for how much multiplication of load forces which existed as each successive level in the Trade Towers gave way. Did they slow things down a little? Yes, a little, almost imperceptively.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!. Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|