![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,105
|
![]() Quote:
Also, has the Catholic church changed their stance on abortion? rejecting Kavanaugh has nothing to do with abortion. I think there has been persuasive evidence given that Kavanaugh was known to drink a lot in HS and college. That undermines his testimony. Granted there can be two different views on what "a lot" means. Likewise "passed out drunk" is not the same as "black out drunk". I agree with Awareness (both sides have lost it and the truth no longer matters) that the questions asked at the hearing were too vague making it too easy for each side to distort the testimony. For example, why didn't they look at the calendar, figure out which days were parties and tried to quantify exactly how many of these drinking parties he went to. Why not ask him how many beers or drinks he would drink. If he said no more than two that could be easily debunked. If he said 6-8 then most of us could assume he was getting drunk at each of these parties. So I think the questions were too vague to be useful for anything but distortion. Some people may think he was "black out drunk" but how would you know that unless you actually talked to him the next day and he had no recollection. I think they are confusing passed out with black out.
__________________
They shall live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|