Does LSM Hold to Apostolic Succession?

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by Cassidy

"Lee himself believes that he stands in the line of apostolic succession, his authority commensurate with that of the twelve apostles."

Apostolic succession is a heresy.

Wait a minute here.

What is so different with Lee's succession of MOTA's, starting with Luther? Is this not apostolic succession in a different form?

Lee judged James as deficient of New Testament revelation, and thus elevated himself past James. Lee portrayed himself as today's Paul. Did he not assume the authority that Paul had too?

[Cassidy]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Wait a minute here.

What is so different with Lee's succession of MOTA's, starting with Luther? Is this not apostolic succession in a different form?

Lee judged James as deficient of New Testament revelation, and thus elevated himself past James. Lee portrayed himself as today's Paul. Did he not assume the authority that Paul had too?

Sorry Ohio. That is off topic, unless you are referring to something Duddy said in his book. If so, please quote it.

However, I will be glad to take up this discussion with you in another thread providing the host approves of the topic. It is a worthy discussion but not here.

Thanks