Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Not quite, it was a pattern: judgment-->blaspheming-->more judgment-->more blaspheming
But one thing is interesting. They stopped blaming Trump for the calamities. They realized global warming was a farce, and they recognized the God of heaven was behind the climate "change."
They no more were liberal agnostics and atheists. They had to make a choice about God. Unfortunately a bad one.
|
I am not a liberal agnostic nor an atheist. You accused me of being part of a climate cult and now you accuse me of being an agnostic or atheist.
This pattern you cite cannot begin with God's judgement. It would have to begin with God's word followed by man's disobedience which then brought God's judgement. Blaspheming is evidence that they refuse to repent even though they were reaping what they sowed.
The judgement is on the Sun allowing it to scorch man (Ozone hole) with great heat (climate change). Why? What actions by man prompted this response by God?
Blasphemy refers to a lack of respect, reverence for God. It is the act of insulting or showing contempt for God. Trump's comment asking for more of that "good ole global warming" is blasphemy.
So we have God's word, Man's disobedience, followed by God's judgement on the Sun (Climate change as evidenced by Puerto Rico, Houston, and California) followed by Man's blasphemy (Trump's comment) which will be followed by more judgement.
So then why not fill in the first two -- what was God's word and what was Man's disobedience?