Local Church Discussions  

Go Back   Local Church Discussions > Apologetic discussions

Apologetic discussions Apologetic Discussions Regarding the Teachings of Watchman Nee and Witness Lee

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2011, 08:54 AM   #1
ZNPaaneah
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,105
Default Re: Combating LC Arguments

Quote:
Originally Posted by aron View Post
True. But as RayLiotta pointed out, that is not the way it is on the street. The publication puts a public face on it. Then, within the actual LRC fellowship, what they call "the church life", you are clearly given the method in which to "pray-read". And if you go into the meetings and deviate from collective practice, you will be marked. You are no longer "one".
How do you ascribe so much to this book? It is a booklet, RG is not called the author or editor but the "compiler" because it is a compilation. To my recollection the vast majority of the quotes were either from the Bible or Christian leaders outside of the LRC. I don't know if he quoted WL at all.

Second, I have travelled to many localities. I have visited every locality in Texas, a few in the Far East, as well as many in California, Florida, Atlanta, NY, Boston, etc. In my experience (which is very limited since 1995) pray reading was practiced differently in different locales. Some emphasized it, some didn't emphasize it as much.

In Taipei it seemed to be quite different from the US.

Things may have changed, perhaps the influence of the LSM and BBs has truly permeated the entire LRC (is the proper term mingled, don't know) But if that is the case why are you ascribing that to RG's booklet published 15 years prior to 96?

I was there when he was researching it, when he wrote it, I read a rough draft of it before publication. His burden was to prove that praying the word was not some kind of far eastern chanting practice brought over from China but was scripturally sound. As I said it was designed as a Polemic to defend the scriptural basis for praying the word back to God. RG is not a theologian, so he didn't add his own 2 cents, instead he compiled a lot of quotes, put them into a good order, and left it at that. To my knowledge he didn't get into the LRC practice other than to put it into the same sphere as praying the word back to God.

Why is he being attacked and vilified for this?
__________________
They shall live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God
ZNPaaneah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2011, 09:31 AM   #2
Ohio
Member
 
Ohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,693
Default Re: Combating LC Arguments

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah View Post
How do you ascribe so much to this book? It is a booklet, RG is not called the author or editor but the "compiler" because it is a compilation. To my recollection the vast majority of the quotes were either from the Bible or Christian leaders outside of the LRC. I don't know if he quoted WL at all.
In the section of end "Notes," titled "The Word as Nourishment," there is one quote by WL.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!.
Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point!
Ohio is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 PM.


3.8.9