Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
Did not all the GLA churches trust Titus Chu and James Reetzke Sr. to adequately investigate the events in Anaheim before these two signed that letter of condemnation to John Ingalls?
Don't tell me that Titus Chu and James Reetzke Sr. were "coerced" into signing that letter of condemnation just like they were "forced" to sign the "letter of allegiance" to WL back in Feb 1986. Did not the two of them just trade their righteousness for hypocrisy, and integrity for man-pleasing? Wouldn't be the last time Reetzke did this either, since the Blendeds demanded the same hypocrisy of him before they could quarantine Titus Chu.
On a leadership level (not referring to the saints here), the history of the Recovery since WN was incarcerated in the late 40's, is just an endless series of political back-stabbings for self gains. That what happens when another man, any man, is promoted above The Man Christ Jesus.
|
I think to be a coworker in the topsy turvy world of the LC system the saying:
"Know which side your bread is buttered on" has to be your motto. You serve at the pleasure and whim of Witness Lee and now the Politburo. Witness Lee gave Titus and Jim a choice. Side with John Ingalls and your position and work in the LC system will be finished. You are currently serving within the realm of
my ministry and that will abruptly end if you cross the line. There is no neutrality. They got clarity real fast.
I'm sure the Politburo gave Chicago a similar choice. Enjoy the influence, infrastructure, funding, etc of being under the LSM umbrella or side with Titus Chu - losing status and having to deal with his rude behavior. Third options are not part of the LC system.