Canfield on the Ground of Locality

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by Igzy

Had the LC truly been for oneness, then they would have softened their stance on both leadership and theology. But that would have diluted their devotion to Lee and the LC culture. And they couldn't have that.

Here it is in a nutshell. It is absolutely impossible to simultaneously have both genuine Christian oneness and devotion to Witness Lee. Devotion to Lee is the single cause for every storm, rebellion, and division within the Recovery. With such a dismal track record, it's no wonder that no outside Christian has joined their "oneness."

[alwayslearning]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Here it is in a nutshell. It is absolutely impossible to simultaneously have both genuine Christian oneness and devotion to Witness Lee. Devotion to Lee is the single cause for every storm, rebellion, and division within the Recovery. With such a dismal track record, it's no wonder that no outside Christian has joined their "oneness."

Impossible indeed!

May I also suggest IMHO outside Christians (those that think about it at all) do not share the same definition of "genuine Christian oneness" as what was taught (not practiced) in the LC system. For the most part they view themselves as one with all genuine Christians but practice their oneness within certain widely defined categories e.g. Mainline Protestant, Conservative Anglican, Charismatic, Mainstream Evangelical, etc. So they are comfortable meeting with any church regardless of denomination within their wider category of conviction (and even beyond within certain limitations.) Their choice of "home church" within a wider category would be based on proximity to their home, friendships, skill of pastors at teaching, activities offered, times of services, etc.

Another expression of their oneness would be working with other churches and Christians to do ministry in their cities and abroad e.g. feeding the poor, building houses, etc.