![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,965
|
![]()
Only if they give themselves a name. That's why they say the church in X is not their name but their description.
Allow me to point something out to you. The word denominate means "to call" or "to name". Look it up: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/denominate A denomination, is a group of people who have named themselves as something other than just Christian, and a group of Christians (a church), which does the same. On this basis, we do not fit that category, we are not a denomination. Paul, was against what Christians said, not who they followed. 1 Corinthians 3:4 says "when one says.." 1 Corinthians 1:12 says "one of you says...". Paul is writing to all the believers in the city of Corinth and telling them not to say they follow him, and not even to say "I follow Christ". In Paul's mind, the church was in unity despite everyone following different ministers, as long as they did not call themselves by their favorite minister's names. He never said stop following me and follow Silas instead, or stop following Silas and start following me. He cared about what they said and what names they took, that is why we care about that as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 524
|
![]() Quote:
Again, the group that calls itself "the church in Irvine" is not the church in Irvine (in totality). To make such a claim is ridiculous. Who composes the church in Irvine? You would say, "All the believers in Irvine." Then, how can "the church in Irvine" describe you group. It doesn't. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,965
|
![]() Quote:
A denomination is essentially an organized or institutionalized faction or schism in the body with a name. Perhaps it's logic you are struggling to understand. Suppose there is once an apple pie (all believers in a city), called the Apple Pie, and it is cut into 4 pieces (there are schisms). Each of those 4 pieces gives itself a name and separates practically (each piece then becomes a denomination). Suppose they decide to name themselves Hot Dog Apple Pie, Muffin Apple Pie, Hamburger Apple Pie, and Pizza Apple Pie. Suppose that one of those pieces realizes they are wrong and want to go back to being just Apple Pie with the other pieces. Suppose Pizza Apple Pie decides to call itself Apple Pie again. So there is Apple Pie, Hot Dog Apple Pie, Muffin Apple Pie, Hamburger Apple Pie. It is correct for Apple Pie to say they are Apple Pie. They have not created for themselves another division, but have gone back to being what they truly were. That's why it is not logical for you to say that those who leave denominations and don't take another name for themselves (even the name or label non-denominational can be divisive) have created another denomination. Ecumenism on the other hand, or denominations hand shaking over the fence, tries to bring the pieces together to create a "Hot Dog Muffin Hamburger Pizza Apple Pie". Until they drop their respective names and labels Hot Dog, Muffin etc, they cannot be Apple Pie again. Now after all that I'm hungry.... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|