Important Announcement regarding the Alternative Views Subforum

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by zeek

Prejudice speaks!

Yo zeek ... Let's let others speak.

Site That Blamed Benghazi On Internet Video Appoints Itself ‘Fake News’ Arbiter

Left-wing website Slate.com should be the final arbiter of what is or not “fake news,” according to left-wing website Slate.

The site, which itself has a questionable track record, announced the launch of a Chrome extension that will alert readers if they are reading something deemed “fake news” by Slate. The announcement comes less than a week after Slate ran a story deemed “ridiculous and false” by CNN anchor Jake Tapper.

Even CNN -- the Clinton News Network -- blasts Slate. What a joke!

Read that link above to see some other great Slate fabrications.

But liberal progressives will cling to their fake news until the left and right coastlines are completely submerged.

[zeek]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Yo zeek ... Let's let others speak.


Even CNN -- the Clinton News Network -- blasts Slate. What a joke!

Read that link above to see some other great Slate fabrications.

But liberal progressives will cling to their fake news until the left and right coastlines are completely submerged.

Your method, that you have repeated ad nauseum here, is to try and condemn, not ideas or putative facts which would be reasonable and appropriate regardless of you own POV] but every political viewpoint, religion, and race that is not your own.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by zeek

Your method, that you have repeated ad nauseum here, is to try and condemn, not ideas or putative facts which would be reasonable and appropriate regardless of you own POV] but every political viewpoint, religion, and race that is not your own.

Well I guess you can't defend Slate.Com's record of fake news and liberal bias, so you have to attack me again, which is your usual course of action in the face of truth, facts, and plain reason.

Let's face it, you are against the Christian faith and the Bible, which is why you are here on the Alt-Views forum openly criticizing it. You turned on me many years ago when I repeatedly came to the defense of the gospel of Christ.

For the last year or so you have incessantly posted your Trump hate, your liberal Obama/Clinton love, and all the accompanying fake news fabrications which you endorse. Then you condemn my pushback.

I don't condemn every religion. I do prefer the Bible, while you love to discredit it, using your hero Bart Ehrman. You obviously favor Islam and Mohammedans, which have numerous terrible and abusive practices which trouble me and have no place in modern society. It is one of the greatest ironies of the 21st century that liberals and progressive feminists would support Islamic practices in the USA.

[zeek]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Well I guess you can't defend Slate.Com's record of fake news and liberal bias, so you have to attack me again, which is your usual course of action in the face of truth, facts, and plain reason.

Let's face it, you are against the Christian faith and the Bible, which is why you are here on the Alt-Views forum openly criticizing it. You turned on me many years ago when I repeatedly came to the defense of the gospel of Christ.

For the last year or so you have incessantly posted your Trump hate, your liberal Obama/Clinton love, and all the accompanying fake news fabrications which you endorse. Then you condemn my pushback.

I don't condemn every religion. I do prefer the Bible, while you love to discredit it, using your hero Bart Ehrman. You obviously favor Islam and Mohammedans, which have numerous terrible and abusive practices which trouble me and have no place in modern society. It is one of the greatest ironies of the 21st century that liberals and progressive feminists would support Islamic practices in the USA.

Your dim opinions of me and my position are simply another example of your extreme prejudice. You have accused of statements I never made because you have lumped me in with a group of people you condemn. That's how you think. I don't see any cure for it. Hate on bro.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by zeek

Your dim opinions of me and my position are simply another example of your extreme prejudice. You have accused of statements I never made because you have lumped me in with a group of people you condemn. That's how you think. I don't see any cure for it. Hate on bro.

It's nothing personal. My "dim" opinions are simply based on what you write.

You keep accusing me of "extreme prejudice" yet cannot rebut my facts.

It's strikes me as quite funny that I need to be "cured" of my "hate" and "extreme prejudice" for exposing fake news websites which you regularly post on this forum.

See you later.

[zeek]

Originally Posted by Ohio

It's nothing personal. My "dim" opinions are simply based on what you write.

You keep accusing me of "extreme prejudice" yet cannot rebut my facts.

It's strikes me as quite funny that I need to be "cured" of my "hate" and "extreme prejudice" for exposing fake news websites which you regularly post on this forum.

See you later.

A lot of the opinions you have attributed to me are based on your conclusion that I'm a liberal rather than anything I have actually said. Your conclusions often don't follow logically from the "facts" you cited. Besides it's not like rebutting your facts would change your mind. That assumes that your position is based on reason, which it isn't.

Show me where I posted a fake news cite. Who told you it was fake news? Tapper finds fault with one article in Slate and you advise not to believe anything you read there. That typifies all-or-nothing, absolutistic thinking. That kind of thinking perpetuates prejudice.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by zeek

A lot of the opinions you have attributed to me are based on your conclusion that I'm a liberal rather than anything I have actually said. Your conclusions often don't follow logically from the "facts" you cited. Besides it's not like rebutting your facts would change your mind. That assumes that your position is based on reason, which it isn't.

Show me where I posted a fake news cite. Who told you it was fake news? Tapper finds fault with one article in Slate and you advise not to believe anything you read there. That typifies all-or-nothing, absolutistic thinking. That kind of thinking perpetuates prejudice.

The link I posted provided numerous examples of fake news from slate.com. How ironic that they would become the arbiter of fake news. Apparently you didn't read it. That's understandable since I usually don't read your links either.

You have often provided numerous links that were simply Trump hate and slander.

It's you who provides absolutistic thinking. You just project your bad traits on me. But being a know-it-all, you can't see yourself objectively.

Why is it, for example, that not one of your posts ever presents either the Bible or Trump positively. I posted numerous times about my concerns about Trump, but you can't hear that because I don't hate like you do. He one the election, but like the media "opposition party," you don't give him a chance.