OBW's Blog

[AndPeter]

Originally Posted by OBW

I challenge Nigel and the rest of those who consider themselves concerned to take a new approach to their disagreements with the LSM. Rather than presume that Lee was right (and even Nee was right) and that the LSM is now twisting those words, start fresh with the actual writings that we should not be going beyond ─ scripture. Intentionally reject Lee’s words and see if the scripture will return you to his teachings. Read the older books again

Mike, I beg to differ with you on this one because normally I find your posts extremely insightful and helpful.

I believe Nigel and others are re-evaluating Witness Lee and Watchman Nee. Consider his latest article about the Jerusalem and Roman city churches.

Even Undergrace on the other forum pointed out some inconsistency with Witness Lee regarding his view of the early universal church.

I think Nigel's and others intent is to re-evaluate based on the Word with help from writings (from many) that aid the understanding. Since we have been under such a strong Nee/Lee influence for many years I believe Nigel finds it appropriate to comment where he finds teachings of these two that no longer hold water.

Steve