Important Announcement regarding the Alternative Views Subforum

[Ohio]

Bombshell: Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook

This is why I say that the accusations against Moore are different.

Yet you are in complete denial about fake news from main stream media.

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Bombshell: Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook

This is why I say that the accusations against Moore are different.

Yet you are in complete denial about fake news from main stream media.

This is despicable. A man signed the yearbook for his waitress and 30 years later they want to tar and feather him.

Once again I think the evidence in this case is pretty clear.

1. Democrats engineered this story to be released when it would be too late to replace Moore on the ticket. Their goal had nothing to do with protecting women but rather an attempt to get a democrat elected.

2. The story has been spun to be given the worst possible impression. This includes embellishing the yearbook signature.

3. Roy Moore is a creep. A 35 year old man creeping around malls trying to get dates with 18 year old girls. This is confirmed by his claim that he never dated a girl without the mother's consent.

4. In a Tit for tat Conyers and Franken got exposed and forced to resign.

The world of politics has done the impossible, it has gotten uglier than it was before.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

The world of politics has done the impossible, it has gotten uglier than it was before.

That ain't ugly. That's been going on forever.

Ugly is the FBI and DNC paying some British ex-agent named Steele to produce the fake "Pee" Dossier on Trump, and then using that phony document to obtain FISA warrant to justify their surveillance of the Trump election team.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

3. Roy Moore is a creep. A 35 year old man creeping around malls trying to get dates with 18 year old girls. This is confirmed by his claim that he never dated a girl without the mother's consent.

Actually I think it is quite gentlemanly to ask permission of her mother before dating. Perhaps traditional Southern customs are offensive to Yankees?

And btw Corfman's details have been exposed as lies. Same with the Mall allegations. Found out there wasn't even a mall in Gadsen in the first place.

Future history books will record the entire Moore smear campaign as a case study in main stream media fake news to overthrow the democratic election process.

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Actually I think it is quite gentlemanly to ask permission of her mother before dating. Perhaps traditional Southern customs are offensive to Yankees?

And btw Corfman's details have been exposed as lies. Same with the Mall allegations. Found out there wasn't even a mall in Gadsen in the first place.

Future history books will record the entire Moore smear campaign as a case study in main stream media fake news to overthrow the democratic election process.

Once again I will repeat that if this is false he will sue. The republican party should handle the entire case. Accusing this woman for libel and slander should be a slam dunk now. The only possible reason that he would not sue is because there is enough truth to these allegations for him not to want to go into a courtroom. There is no reasonable justification to me for him to not sue.

If this is in fact a smear campaign that is not in any way based on fact there are many people who have made documented claims that he could sue.

As far as I am concerned the allegations are ugly because they were made to influence the election and never were intended to actually be tested in a court of law. I consider his denial by that same standard. If he is not willing to prove it in a court of law I won't consider it credible.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

Once again I will repeat that if this is false he will sue. The republican party should handle the entire case. Accusing this woman for libel and slander should be a slam dunk now. The only possible reason that he would not sue is because there is enough truth to these allegations for him not to want to go into a courtroom. There is no reasonable justification to me for him to not sue.

If this is in fact a smear campaign that is not in any way based on fact there are many people who have made documented claims that he could sue.

As far as I am concerned the allegations are ugly because they were made to influence the election and never were intended to actually be tested in a court of law. I consider his denial by that same standard. If he is not willing to prove it in a court of law I won't consider it credible.

People make scurrilous claims all the time just to smear someone's reputation. If the defendant filed a lawsuit every time, then the courts would be inundated with claims. This never was about legal remedy.

There are many reasons why Moore might not sue. Who wants to spend their life in litigation? Moore is 70 years old, and must have a few more positive things he wants to do as a Senator. Besides, people believe what they want to believe. Court decisions won't change that.

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by Ohio

People make scurrilous claims all the time just to smear someone's reputation. If the defendant filed a lawsuit every time, then the courts would be inundated with claims. This never was about legal remedy.

There are many reasons why Moore might not sue. Who wants to spend their life in litigation? Moore is 70 years old, and must have a few more positive things he wants to do as a Senator. Besides, people believe what they want to believe. Court decisions won't change that.

This is different, the woman provided a document that she has since admitted was doctored. This charge was rejected by Moore as completely false. The entire episode has been documented on the news with interviews. Simply go to court with the various interviews that are already part of the record. The Republican party could handle this entire thing without Moore even having to do anything.

By doing this the Republican party and Moore would be vindicated (the Republican party is now be lambasted as the party that embraces pedophiles). But more than that imagine what happens at the next election -- any smear of any candidate would get a full blown repeat of the egg all over the face of the Democrats in this case. The cherry on the top would be if the woman admits she was put up to this. Democrats across the country would be bashed. Imagine how angry so many people would be if they chose not to vote for Moore because of these allegations and then later they were proven to be false. This outrage would sweep the electorate in other elections as well.

So once again, my point is this, if Moore is telling the truth then he will and absolutely must sue this woman for libel and slander. The Republican party has everything to gain but cannot do this without his consent.

[Ohio]

As an opinion editor John Nolte expresses the kind of common sense conservatism that cuts straight through today's "politically correct" news commentary. I think his latest piece summarizes well the current thinking about Judge Roy Moore.

Pragmatism vs. Cake Baking:
Christians Can Vote for Roy Moore in Good Conscience

Here is the Introduction:

Because I believe that even in the court of public opinion a fellow American deserves due process, unlike too many out there, until all the facts were in, I kept my mouth shut about the allegations against Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Rather than immediately cave to the corrupt media and #NeverTrump’s tribal pressure to do the right thing and denounce the Alabama Republican… I waited — I waited because the media lies. I waited because #NeverTrump lies. And now that all the evidence is in, we know that the allegations against Moore are either completely trumped up, an act of outright fraud, or full of massive holes.