Important Announcement regarding the Alternative Views Subforum

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by awareness

During a roundtable with California leaders on Wednesday Trump said :

“We’re taking people out of the country. You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are,” he said. “These aren’t people. These are animals.”

Given that over 80% of Evangelicals supported Trump, I have one question :

How could those that are suppose to be the salt of the earth get mixed up with those that put salt in the wounds?

Awareness, why do you support MS-13 gangs who torture people and put salt in their wounds?

Read this: ‘You feel that the devil is helping you’: MS-13’s satanic history

And this: Obama’s DACA program tied to growth of deadly MS-13 gang which has spread to 22 states: End it NOW

Trump rightly calls MS-13 animals, just like Peter did ...

"But these ones as beasts without reason, made to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming in things they are ignorant of, shall also perish in their own corruption." -- 2 Peter 2.12

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Awareness, why do you support MS-13 gangs who torture people and put salt in their wounds?

Read this: ‘You feel that the devil is helping you’: MS-13’s satanic history

And this: Obama’s DACA program tied to growth of deadly MS-13 gang which has spread to 22 states: End it NOW

Trump rightly calls MS-13 animals, just like Peter did ...

"But these ones as beasts without reason, made to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming in things they are ignorant of, shall also perish in their own corruption." -- 2 Peter 2.12

Well, that explains that.

[awareness]

Originally Posted by Ohio

Awareness, why do you support MS-13 gangs who torture people and put salt in their wounds?

Read this: ‘You feel that the devil is helping you’: MS-13’s satanic history

And this: Obama’s DACA program tied to growth of deadly MS-13 gang which has spread to 22 states: End it NOW

Trump rightly calls MS-13 animals, just like Peter did ...

"But these ones as beasts without reason, made to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming in things they are ignorant of, shall also perish in their own corruption." -- 2 Peter 2.12

But you should be happy. It all points to Armageddon right around the corner.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by awareness

But you should be happy. It all points to Armageddon right around the corner.

No, I'm not happy with the way you distort and defame Christians.

You are far worse than W. Lee ever was.

[awareness]

Originally Posted by Ohio

No, I'm not happy with the way you distort and defame Christians.

Christians distort and defame themselves plenty without me. You just hate when I point it out.

Apparently, over 80% of Evangelicals give the rest of them a bad name ... or give Jesus a bad name.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by awareness

Christians distort and defame themselves plenty without me. You just hate when I point it out.

Apparently, over 80% of Evangelicals give the rest of them a bad name ... or give Jesus a bad name.

How can you defend MS-13 gang members, some of which stabbed a guy 100 times and ripped his heart out? Others have beaten young girls unrecognizable.

You condemn a Christian for how he votes, and then condemn the president for calling murderers "animals."

Your comments and attitude give Jesus a bad name.

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by Ohio

How can you defend MS-13 gang members, some of which stabbed a guy 100 times and ripped his heart out? Others have beaten young girls unrecognizable.

You condemn a Christian for how he votes, and then condemn the president for calling murderers "animals."

Your comments and attitude give Jesus a bad name.

I felt that Trump's comments were so obviously pointing to these individuals and yet vague enough to bait the faux outrage.

As a scientist calling a human an animal doesn't offend my sensibilities. What bothered me was he said that only some of them were animals! What are the other ones?

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

I felt that Trump's comments were so obviously pointing to these individuals and yet vague enough to bait the faux outrage.

It was only vague when taken out of context by editing out the actual question Trump was answering. No reporter who was there at the time could have made such a mistake without the deliberate intention to smear Trump.

You act as if it was Trump who "baited the faux outrage."