Important Announcement regarding the Alternative Views Subforum

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by Ohio

And btw are you still clinging to the Russian collusion hoax? You got hundreds of posts to recant, my friend.

Maybe you should start a new thread -- Posts I regret

[awareness]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

Maybe you should start a new thread -- Posts I regret

Kav is in. Bet that won't be on that thread.

[ZNPaaneah]

Originally Posted by awareness

Kav is in. Bet that won't be on that thread.

Democrats are angry there is only 1 copy to view. Clearly that is a response to previous leaks of confidential documents. They are simply reaping what they sowed in not being trustworthy.

Democrats are angry that Kavanaugh and Ford were not questioned. Really? If Ford had anything more to say she should have said it during the hearing. If there was anything based on what Ford said and Kavanaugh responded with as well as any of the other people questioned that would support her testimony it might have meant they would need to question him. Clearly there wasn't.

Finally a sober minded assessment of what is and what is not a crime. I doubt the FBI is called in very often to investigate teenage drinking from 36 years previously without a crime. Second, it is very difficult to see from Ford's testimony that there is the accusation of a crime, and even if you give her that much it seems clear to me that there was no corroboration of the "criminal allegation".

Finally, was his outburst a sign of lacking the right "disposition" or is it the outrage at the ridiculousness of even pursuing these allegations without evidence or corroborating witnesses?

[awareness]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

Democrats are angry there is only 1 copy to view. Clearly that is a response to previous leaks of confidential documents. They are simply reaping what they sowed in not being trustworthy.

Democrats are angry that Kavanaugh and Ford were not questioned. Really? If Ford had anything more to say she should have said it during the hearing. If there was anything based on what Ford said and Kavanaugh responded with as well as any of the other people questioned that would support her testimony it might have meant they would need to question him. Clearly there wasn't.

Finally a sober minded assessment of what is and what is not a crime. I doubt the FBI is called in very often to investigate teenage drinking from 36 years previously without a crime. Second, it is very difficult to see from Ford's testimony that there is the accusation of a crime, and even if you give her that much it seems clear to me that there was no corroboration of the "criminal allegation".

Finally, was his outburst a sign of lacking the right "disposition" or is it the outrage at the ridiculousness of even pursuing these allegations without evidence or corroborating witnesses?

No reason to carry on. Kav is in.

[Ohio]

Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah

Maybe you should start a new thread -- Posts I regret

Thanks. Needed a good laugh.