![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,333
|
![]() Quote:
It's circular. Why is he the MOTA? Because of his esoteric theology. Why is his theology so special, even to the point you swallow things that make no sense? Because he's the MOTA. But, as I said, no decent theology requires the imprimatur of a special minister. The theology should stand on its own. Lee's really doesn't. So when it sags they say, "How can you question the MOTA?" I don't think they necessarily do this cynically. It's just the self-perpetuating mindset of these types of groups. But, to my main point again, if LCers were really honest they would admit that all the MOTA claptrap is a crutch. If they want their ideas to prevail in the arena of ideas, they should force themselves to see if they can stand on their own. Normal people aren't going to buy this MOTA crap, only the Kool-Aid drinkers. Well, swaying the Kool-Aid drinkers is easy, it's the other 98% that are a problem. That's basically what LSM offers. A theology for Kool-Aid drinkers. I think Lee was onto some things. I said that. But all Lee, all the time, as a main course? No, thank you very much. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|