Important Announcement regarding the Alternative Views Subforum

[awareness]

Originally Posted by zeek

Your statement reinforces what I already proposed below, i.e. that we judge Nee's propositions not Nee. Now if Jesus or the authors of the Bible thought it was wrong for Christians to hold political office, why didn't they just say so directly? Why beat around the bush?

Nee was gifted at waxing flamboyant with scripture. Not just with this minor concern, of Christians and government, but with his flagship doctrine ; that of the ground of the church. Nowhere in the New Testament is the doctrine or principle of one church one city explicitly developed. Nee embellished it into an extra-Biblical doctrine and dogma, and made it the bases of his movement.

Same with the MOTA ... that we've yet to discuss.