![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Natal Transvaal
Posts: 5,632
|
![]() Quote:
By pray-reading bullet points? Because that is what they did? By speaking 2 minutes on Sunday morning of what they 'enjoyed' from HWFMR? How could they function today? How could they do anything like what they did? Now, suppose by way of comparison, any other functional saint of yore would fall into the same issue. Wesley couldn't function today in the Methodist Church, or Luther in the Lutheran Church, or Edwards in the Congregational Church (the last one I do believe!). Does that make the "Lord's Recovery" hypocrisy any less glaring? Even if it were so? Where's the pure and spotless bride? Claiming everyone else is as sullied as she? Ignoring and hoping you not think about how she's built, at least in part, on the revelations and teachings and spiritual visions of those who today couldn't even share 5 minutes from the lectern? And remember, it's not like the "Lord's Recovery" used these women and then pretended they didn't exist. No, they're loudly and repeatedly trumpeted as lionesses, pillars of the early "Recovery" church's vision. And not one could even give a Sunday message in a "Lord's Recovery" local church. Simply because they're women. Not one pamphlet from any of them. Not a page. Not a word. I'm trying to think of a hypocrisy that could possibly be more glaring, either real or hypothetical. No dice - this one is the high peak, the consummation, the crystallisation. (of course I'm subjectively biased, I admit; emotionally invested in my argument. But still it's got to be somewhere near the top).
__________________
"Freedom is free. It's slavery that's so horribly expensive" - Colonel Templeton, ret., of the 12th Scottish Highlanders, the 'Black Fusiliers' |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|